)
)
Harvest alternatives: summary & key takeaways
Why teams are switching: Harvest's 2025 acquisition by Bending Spoons brought a new plan structure and usage-based "Flex" billing that makes agency costs harder to predict.
What to look for: Predictable pricing, time-to-invoice workflow, project management and time in one place, billable utilization reporting, and a clean import path.
The shortlist: Nine vetted options, led by Teamwork.com for teams that want time tracking built into full project delivery on flat per-seat pricing.
The honest take: Harvest is still a good product; the trigger for most switchers is pricing uncertainty, not a broken tool.
If you're on Harvest and got a renewal notice that made you blink, you're not alone. Harvest is still a capable time tracker, and for years it was the default for freelancers and small agencies who wanted timers and invoicing without fuss. What changed in 2026 isn't the product. It's the math.
I work at Teamwork.com, and before that I spent years managing teams in agencies where I lived the Monday morning capacity scramble and chased the timesheets that never arrived. So when Harvest was acquired by Bending Spoons in 2025 and the pricing moved to a Teams and Enterprise structure with usage-based "Flex" billing, I paid attention. Some long-time customers have reported steep renewal increases, and the post-trial checkout now defaults to the Enterprise plan on annual billing.
Here's the good news: you have real options. Below, I break down what to check before you move, then walk through nine alternatives I'd actually put in front of an agency, starting with where time tracking fits into the bigger picture of client delivery.
What changed with Harvest's pricing in 2026
The short version: Harvest still does time tracking well, but the bill is now harder to forecast. According to Harvest's own pricing page, the plans split into Teams (starting at $9 per seat per month billed annually, or $11 monthly) and Enterprise (starting at $14 per seat per month billed annually, or $17.50 monthly), plus a free tier for one seat and two projects. Harvest was acquired by Bending Spoons in 2025.
The part that catches agencies out is Harvest pricing in 2026 and how Flex usage billing works. Your base seat rate covers core features, but additional invoices, projects, clients, and tasks get billed based on what you use. In practice, your bill scales with volume, not just headcount.
For a growing agency, that's the rub. Add a busy month with more client invoices and active projects, and the cost creeps up in ways a flat per-seat plan never would. Predictable budgeting gets harder exactly when you're trying to protect margins.
None of this makes Harvest a bad tool. It makes it a tool whose pricing model may no longer match how agencies want to buy. That's reason enough to look at what else is out there.
What to look for in a Harvest alternative
Before you chase feature lists, get clear on what actually protects your agency. In my experience, teams that switch on price alone end up switching again in a year. Here's the checklist I'd use.
Predictable pricing model: Flat per-seat or flat-plan pricing so you know what you'll pay as you grow, with no usage surprises.
Time-to-invoice workflow: Logged hours should flow into billing without re-keying data across tools.
Project management and time in one place: Time tracking is more useful when it sits inside the work it measures, not in a separate silo. See how we track billable hours alongside delivery.
Billable utilization reporting: You need to see billable versus non-billable time by person and project to defend margins.
A real migration path: Look for CSV import of time entries, clients, and projects so you don't rebuild history by hand.
That last point matters more than people expect. A tool can win on paper and still cost you weeks if the import path is thin.
Quick glance: 9 best Harvest alternatives
Tool
Pricing verified from each vendor's official pricing page in July 2026. Now let's get into the reviews.
Teamwork.com
)
I'll start with the tool I know best and the reason it leads this list: for agencies leaving Harvest, the biggest gap isn't the timer, it's everything around it. Teamwork.com is an AI-powered project and resource management platform built for client work, with time tracking baked into the same place you plan, deliver, and bill the work. You're not bolting a tracker onto your projects; the tracking is part of the project.
That matters because the point of tracking time is rarely time itself. It's utilization, budgets, and profitability. A built-in stop-start timer runs while you work, you mark time billable or non-billable, and those hours feed straight into budgets and invoices, so nothing leaks between tools. When you want to know who's overbooked before you promise a client a quick turnaround, live capacity is right there in the Workload Planner.
)
On the money side, this is where the Harvest contrast lands hardest. See margins slip before they cost you the project: budget tracking flags spend against fixed-fee, retainer, and time-and-materials budgets in real time, and the AI Forecaster turns historical cost and revenue data into profitability predictions.
)
When a healthcare consulting firm, Community Link Consulting, moved off fragmented spreadsheets into Teamwork.com, they increased billable hours while reducing team burnout. That's the payoff when time tracking sits inside project profitability rather than in a separate app.
The pricing model is the other half of the story: flat per-seat plans, so your bill tracks headcount, not invoice volume. You know what you'll pay as you grow.
"Teamwork is an impressive project management platform that powers our agency. I use it every day to manage my team's tasks, review deadlines, and steps in various project approval processes." — Christopher F., Group Lead, Search Engine Optimization, G2
Best for: Agencies and services teams that want time tracking, project delivery, resourcing, and profitability in one platform on predictable pricing.
Limitations:
More capability than a solo freelancer who only needs a timer will use.
Advanced reporting and resourcing take some setup time to tailor to your workflow.
Pricing:
Free: $0 for up to 5 users.
Basics: $9.99/user/month (billed annually).
Accelerate: $24.99/user/month (billed annually).
Optimize and Enterprise: Custom pricing, contact sales.
Toggl Track
)
If your priority is getting a team to actually track time without a fight, Toggl Track is the easiest adoption I've seen. The timer is frictionless across web, desktop, mobile, and a browser extension that plugs into 100-plus tools, and idle detection nudges people when a timer's been running with no activity. For teams migrating off Harvest who just want the tracking habit to survive the move, that low friction is the whole pitch.
Where it stays lean is deep project delivery. Toggl Track reports on billable rates, profitability, and utilization well, but it's a time tracker first, not a place to run the whole project. You'll still pair it with a separate PM tool for task management and client collaboration.
Best for: Teams that want the simplest possible time tracking with strong reporting.
Limitations:
Not a full project management platform; expect to run it alongside one.
Profitability analysis sits on the higher-tier plan.
Pricing:
Free: $0 for a limited number of users.
Starter: $9/user/month (billed annually).
Premium: $18/user/month (billed annually).
Enterprise: Custom pricing, contact sales.
Clockify
)
Clockify is the value pick, and it earns that label honestly. The free plan covers unlimited users and unlimited tracking, which is rare, and the paid tiers stay cheap even as you scale a bigger team. If budget is the reason you're leaving Harvest, this is the shortest path to a lower line item.
The catch is that "cheap and broad" comes with trade-offs in polish. Clockify does a lot, from timers to scheduling to expenses, but the reporting and admin can feel utilitarian compared to more focused tools. It's dependable rather than delightful, and for a lot of agencies that's a fair trade.
One thing I appreciate is how far the free tier genuinely goes for a small team testing the waters. You can validate the workflow before you spend a cent.
Best for: Cost-conscious teams that need unlimited users on a tight budget.
Limitations:
Interface and reporting feel functional rather than refined.
Deeper features are spread across several paid add-ons.
Pricing:
Free: $0, unlimited users.
Basic: $3.99/user/month (billed annually).
Standard: $5.49/user/month (billed annually).
Pro: $7.99/user/month (billed annually).
Enterprise: $11.99/user/month (billed annually).
TimeCamp
)
TimeCamp is worth a look if your needs stretch past project time into attendance and workforce tracking. Alongside timers and billable time, it handles attendance, time-off, and overtime, which makes it a fit for agencies that also need to manage schedules and payroll-adjacent data in one place.
Automatic tracking of apps and websites, budgeting alerts, and invoicing round it out, and the free plan supports unlimited users, so a small team can start without cost. The reporting is solid for the price, though the attendance features can feel like more than a pure client-work agency needs.
Best for: Teams that want time tracking plus attendance and time-off management.
Limitations:
Attendance features add complexity if all you want is billable time.
Some billing and cost features sit on higher tiers.
Pricing:
Free: $0, unlimited users.
Starter: $3.99/user/month (billed annually).
Premium: $6.99/user/month (billed annually).
Ultimate: $9.99/user/month (billed annually).
Enterprise: Custom pricing, contact sales.
Everhour
)
Everhour's whole personality is that it lives inside the tools you already use. It embeds time tracking directly into Asana, Trello, Jira, ClickUp, and others, so your team logs time without leaving the task view. If you've standardized on a PM tool and only ever missed the time layer, this slots in cleanly.
The pricing is refreshingly honest too: one paid plan with all features, no tiers gating budgeting or invoicing behind an upsell. The trade-off is the five-seat minimum on the paid plan, which makes it less economical for very small teams, and its usefulness depends on you already running a supported PM tool.
Best for: Teams that want time tracking embedded inside an existing project management tool.
Limitations:
Five-seat minimum on the paid plan.
Value depends on using one of its supported PM integrations.
Pricing:
Free: $0 for up to 5 seats.
Team: $8.50/seat/month (billed annually, minimum 5 seats).
Custom: Custom pricing for larger teams, contact sales.
Timely
)
Timely leans hard into automatic tracking. It records activity across your apps in the background and uses AI to draft timesheets, so instead of remembering to start a timer, your team reviews and confirms what the tool already captured. For people who chronically forget to track, that flips the problem on its head.
That automation is the draw and the caution. Some teams love not chasing timers; others want more manual control over what gets logged. There's no free plan, only a 14-day trial, and the per-user cost climbs on higher tiers as you add capacity and planning features.
Best for: Teams that want time captured automatically rather than manually.
Limitations:
No free plan, only a trial.
Automatic tracking suits some teams more than others.
Pricing:
Starter: $9/user/month (billed annually), maximum 5 users.
Premium: $16/user/month (billed annually), maximum 50 users.
Unlimited: $22/user/month (billed annually).
Enterprise: Custom pricing, contact sales.
QuickBooks Time
)
QuickBooks Time makes the most sense when your books already live in QuickBooks, since it requires a QuickBooks Online account and syncs time straight into payroll and invoicing. For accounting-first teams, that tight loop between hours worked and money paid is the reason to pick it.
Best for: Teams already running QuickBooks Online that want time and payroll connected.
Limitations:
Requires a QuickBooks Online subscription, so it's not standalone.
The base fee plus per-user structure adds up for larger teams.
Pricing:
Time Premium: $20/month base fee plus $10/user/month.
Time Elite: $40/month base fee plus $12/user/month.
FreshBooks
)
FreshBooks comes at time tracking from the invoicing side, and for freelancers and very small firms that's exactly right. It's an accounting and invoicing tool with time tracking included, so logged hours turn into polished invoices fast, and the client-facing billing experience is genuinely pleasant. Project profitability shows up on the Premium tier for teams that want to watch margins.
Where it fits less well is multi-person agency delivery. Pricing is per plan rather than per seat, with team members added as a paid extra, so it's built around a primary account holder plus collaborators rather than a full delivery team.
Best for: Freelancers and invoicing-first businesses that want billing and time in one tool.
Limitations:
Team members cost extra on top of the plan price.
Less suited to larger, delivery-heavy agency teams.
Pricing:
Lite: $23/month.
Plus: $43/month.
Premium: $70/month.
Select: Custom pricing, contact sales.
Team members: $11/month per additional user.
Tick
)
Tick keeps things deliberately simple, built around one idea: hit your budgets. It ties time entries to project budgets and shows you burn rate as you go, with unlimited users on every plan and pricing set by how many active projects you run. For a small team that wants budget awareness without a learning curve, that focus is the appeal.
Best for: Small teams that want budget-focused time tracking with minimal setup.
Limitations:
Priced by project count, which can pinch teams juggling many small projects.
Feature set is intentionally narrow, with limited reporting depth.
Pricing:
Free: $0 for 1 project, unlimited users.
10 projects: $19/month.
30 projects: $49/month.
60 projects: $79/month.
Unlimited projects: $149/month.
Migrating off Harvest without losing your data
The switch is less painful than most people fear, as long as you plan the export. Harvest lets you export time entries, clients, and projects as CSV files, and that covers most of what you'll want to carry over.
Here's how I'd approach it. Export your time entries, client list, and project list first, then map them into your new tool's import format before you touch live work. Most tools on this list, including Teamwork.com, accept CSV imports for projects and people, so your history and structure come across without manual rebuilding.
What usually needs a rebuild is the connective tissue: budgets, billable rates, and any integrations wired into Harvest. Set those up fresh in the new tool rather than trying to force a like-for-like copy. If you want a steer on tool selection by team type, our guides to agency time tracking software and time tracking software for consultants go deeper.
Pro tip
Run both tools in parallel for one billing cycle. You confirm the new setup invoices correctly before you switch off Harvest, and you keep a clean audit trail.
Why Teamwork.com stands out for teams leaving Harvest
Most tools on this list track time well. The reason I put Teamwork.com first is that agencies leaving Harvest are usually solving a bigger problem than the timer, even if the renewal notice is what started the conversation.
The pattern I keep seeing is teams running a tracker in one place, a PM tool in another, and a budget spreadsheet in a third, then wondering why profitability is a mystery until the project's over. When time, projects, budgets, and reporting live together, utilization and margin stop being a month-end guessing game. That's the whole reason we built time tracking into the platform rather than beside it.
There's a commercial backdrop here too. In Teamwork.com's research for the report on how to prove value beyond price, 66% of senior leaders said clients are now more demanding but less willing to pay for the work. When clients squeeze, the agencies that hold their margins are the ones who can see billable utilization and project profitability in real time, not the ones reconstructing it after the fact. If you want to benchmark where you stand, our billable utilization rate calculator is a quick gut check.
And on the specific thing that sent you looking: predictable, flat per-seat pricing means your software cost tracks your headcount, not your invoice volume. You can plan your budget for the year and know it'll hold.
FAQs about Harvest alternatives
Is Harvest still worth it in 2026?
For solo freelancers and very small teams that mainly need a clean timer and simple invoicing, Harvest is still a solid choice. The reason many agencies are re-evaluating is the 2026 move to usage-based Flex billing, which makes costs harder to predict as invoice and project volume grows. If predictable pricing and deeper project delivery matter to you, it's worth comparing options.
Why did Harvest's pricing change?
Harvest was acquired by Bending Spoons in 2025, and the pricing was restructured into Teams and Enterprise plans with usage-based Flex billing. Fees now scale with invoices, projects, clients, and tasks on top of your base seat rate. Bending Spoons has restructured other products it acquired, including Evernote and WeTransfer.
How much does Harvest cost now?
According to Harvest's pricing page, Teams starts at $9 per seat per month billed annually (or $11 monthly), and Enterprise starts at $14 per seat per month billed annually (or $17.50 monthly). There's also a free tier for one seat and two projects. Usage-based fees for additional invoices, projects, and clients apply on top of the base rate.
What's the best free Harvest alternative?
Clockify and TimeCamp both offer free plans with unlimited users, which is generous for a small team getting started. Teamwork.com offers a free plan for up to five users if you want time tracking inside a full project delivery tool rather than a standalone tracker.
What can replace Harvest Forecast?
If you used Harvest Forecast for resource planning, look for a tool with built-in resource scheduling and capacity planning. Teamwork.com covers this with workload planning and resource scheduling in the same platform as time tracking, so forecasting capacity and tracking actuals happen in one place instead of two connected apps.
)
)
)
)